God’s six primary characteristics

As you know that we went through some of the best points here stated by Goracanda in the previous title. But here he continues his heated debate with word. Characteristic of God.
Conversation continued…by Goracanda

The first characteristic of Bhagavan is complete opulence which refers to the ultimate of greatness and minuteness. The second characteristic of God is that He is the most powerful, because He possesses all saktis (potencies) that which is beyond the reach of human intellect is governed by Isvara’s acintya sakti (God’s inconceivable potency),by which He simultaneously possesses form, and is formless. If one thinks that God can not have a form, one rejects His acintya-sakti (inconceivable potency) by which Krishna (God) manifests His eternal form and pastimes before His devotees. Allah, Brahma or paramatma (living soul in our heart) are formless (nirvaraga) so they do not have any special wonderful characteristics.
The third characteristics of Bhagavan is He always mangalamanya (auspious) and yasa-purna (all-famous). Therefore, His pastimes are full of nectar. His fourth characteristic is that He possesses all Beauty who is incomparable (saundarya), and all the living beings who are endowed with transcendental vision see Him as the most beautiful person. Bhagavan’s fifth characteristic is that He is pure, complete, omniscient, and transcendental to mundane matter. His form is the very embodiment of consciousness and it beyond all the material elements (bhuta). His sixth characteristic is that, unattached (nirlepa) and independent (svatantra). These are the Bhagavan’s (Krishna’s) six primary characteristics.

Apart from that, Bhagavan has two manifestations; His feature of aiswarya (majesty) and His feature of madhurya (sweetness). His sweetness manifestation is the supreme friend for the jivas, (Souls or living beings) and it is that personality, known as Krishna or Caitanya, who is the Lord of our hearts. You have said that worshiping some imaginary form of the lord is worship of material forms, but-parast (Arabic) or bhuta-puja (worship of matter in Sanskrit), and we also agree with that. The rule of the vaisnavas (devotees of Krishna or followers) is to worship fully conscious, eternal Deity form of Bhagavan. Therefore, idolatry (but-parast) is not part of the vaisnavas doctrine. (Sanatana dharma-eternal religion)

One should clearly understand that the Vaisnavas worship of the Deity is not idolatry. One can not prohibit Deity worship simply because some books forbid idolatry; everything depends on the quality of faith in the worshiper’s hearts. The more one’s heart can transcend the influence of matter, the more competent one will be worship the pure form of the Deity. You are learned scholar, the chief of Muslim scholar, and your heart may be free from the influence of matter, but what about those of your disciples who are not so learned? Are their hearts are free from all thoughts of matter?

The more one is absorbed in thoughts of matter, the more he will be implicated in the worship of matter. Although he may claim that lord is formless, his heart is still filled with thoughts of matter. It is very difficult for the general mass of people to worship the pure form of Deity, for such worship is strictly a matter of personal qualification. I sincerely request you to consider this subject very carefully.

By concluding in this way scholar Goracanda devotee of lord Krishna finishes his erudite answer for his question. The Muslim scholar again putting another very depth questions as follows to Goracanda.

Muslim scholar: I have considered your statement carefully. You say that Bhagavan’s refers to six astonishing attributes of the supreme, and I have concluded that the Quran Sharif describes the same six qualities in relationship to the word Allah. There is no point arguing over the meaning of the word Allah. Allah is Bhagavan.

Goracanda replies: Very good. If that is so….this debate continues in the title of Need of spiritual qualification

Kindly note: All the vedic point of views will not agree with any other religion. If you cleverly interpret this for your religious purpose,you'll be trouble by another. You may be a cleverest person now and can nicely interpolate this in your theory,but in future some one may come who may be very cleverer then you and He will easily refute your theory. So better not to try for attaching this into your line. My point can be understood only by if you bit elevated in spiritual path irrespective any religion.